Skip to content

Excessively lengthy police investigations into sexual offences

Survivors of sexual violence and abuse are being forced to wait far too long for police to investigate their reports.

At the end of March 2025, at least 13,949 survivors of sexual violence had been waiting longer than 3 years for their cases to be investigated by police.

Over the last decade, a staggering 37,188 sexual offence investigations have taken longer than three years to reach an outcome.

And the problem is only getting worse: over the last decade, the number of sexual offence cases that took longer than three years to conclude rose by a shocking 652%.

We’re taking action to protect survivors – justice delayed is justice denied.

Together with Cambridge Rape Crisis Centre, the Centre for Women’s Justice and Bindmans LLP, we’ve submitted a ‘super-complaint’ regarding these systemic issues in policing, which, if accepted, will mean they cannot ignore our call for change.

What impact do delays have on survivors?

The decision to report a sexual offence to the police is not an easy one. Yet every year tens of thousands of survivors do, only to find themselves waiting years for the police to investigate.

These delays go far beyond simply having to wait. They retraumatise survivors, cause lasting harm to their mental health, and prevent them from recovering and rebuilding their lives.

The experience of reporting to the police is now so negative for some, that two-thirds of survivors we surveyed said they wouldn’t bother reporting again.

On top of the damage to mental and emotional well-being, delays can also:

  • Destroy trust and confidence in the police
  • Prevent survivors from accessing vital specialist therapeutic support, for fear of ‘jeopardising their case’
  • Affect relationships, family life, financial security, parenting ability, education, employment and physical health
  • Leave survivors vulnerable to further abuse and exploitation

In short, these delays are inhumane, unjust and untenable. And they must come to an end.

A woman with her back to us is walking her small dog through the woods.

“The experience of the criminal justice system/police investigation has been so re-traumatising and has ruined my life.” (Survivor, investigation ongoing, five years and five months)

How bad are the delays?

We submitted a FOI (Freedom of Information request) to the Home Office.

The data showed that between 2014/15 and 2024/25:

  • 37,188 sexual offence investigations have taken longer than three years to investigate
  • 13,949 of these investigations were still ongoing at the end of March 2025.
  • 23,239 were closed. Of these, more than half took over four years to investigate, and many significantly longer.

Long-running investigations have increased dramatically: a six-fold-fold and a 15-fold increase for cases lasting three to four years. See page 29 of the full report.

Survivors deserve justice without delay

We believe survivors of sexual violence should receive timely justice — not be left waiting years because of slow and broken systems.

Excessively long police investigations retraumatise survivors and deny them the chance to recover and move forward.

Whilst these systemic delays are urgently addressed, survivors should be properly supported and protected throughout the investigative process.

That’s why we’re submitting a super-complaint to help end excessive delays in police investigations.

The image shows a photo of the back of a statue of Lady Justice, holding up scales in her right hand.

“I find it difficult to bring myself to explain the level of pure disappointment I feel towards the police. The police are supposed to be a body that protects citizens. The police have not just failed me, but many others. It is truly inhumane to put a victim through a process lasting nine years. I have been disappointed by the so-called justice system under which we are meant to feel safe”. AB, Survivor

Why are these delays happening?

We’ve identified five factors causing and contributing to excessively lengthy police investigations:

  • Deprioritisation of certain cases
  • Staff shortages and lack of resources
  • Poor oversight, leadership and management
  • Poor coordination between police and prosecutors
  • Changes to bail rules before someone is charged, including the practice of ‘release under investigation’.

Our criminal justice system is broken.

Survivors of sexual violence and abuse deserve better.

In November, we published Living in Limbo, which sets out the scale of the Crown Court backlog and the delays experienced by sexual violence and abuse survivors awaiting trial. Combined with this new super-complaint regarding lengthy police investigations, the situation for survivors accessing the criminal justice system is bleak.

  • Pre-charge, survivors of sexual violence and abuse are facing excessively lengthy waits for trial, as set out above.
  • 58% of adult rape survivors alone withdraw their support for a case before a police investigation has concluded, many citing the delays
  • For those who continue to engage with the police, very few will see their perpetrator charged. Around 8% of investigations into adult rape result in a charge.
  • Post-charge, delays continue. There are currently over 13,000 sexual offence cases awaiting trial in the Crown Court backlog - a 66% increase in less than 3 years.
  • Adult survivors of rape are made to wait far longer for their day in court compared to people who have experienced other crimes – 499 days on average, compared to 284 days on average for other crime types. Living in Limbo shows us that often the wait is much longer.
  • 1 in 3 rape trials are postponed at least once.
  • Post-charge 18% of adult cases that are stopped are stopped because the survivor no longer supports the prosecution. Many cite the court delays.
  • It is estimated that only 85% of survivors report to the police. In 2024/25, there were 71,540 rapes reported to the police (excluding all other sexual offences). In the same year, there were 2,623 convictions for rape.
Photo of Westminster during day time

How our super-complaint can bring justice to survivors

A police super-complaint is different and more powerful than a formal complaint to an individual police force or the Home Office, because it triggers a set of mandatory procedures that legally have to happen after it’s submitted, and is reviewed by official decision-making bodies.

Super-complaints lead to change because they:

  • Cannot be ignored – once submitted, the super-complaint bodies are legally required to assess them.
  • Must be replied to publicly – the super-complaint bodies must publish their findings and say what they plan to do about the problem
  • Examine the bigger picture – super-complaints are focused on systemic issues in policing nationally, rather than individual police forces.
  • Can lead to formal recommendations for change
  • Have a time limit for investigation – which adds accountability

Find more information on the process here.

As part of our super-complaint, we’ve come up with 23 crucial recommendations for change, including:

  • Sexual offence investigations that have lasted for 3+ years must be identified, reviewed and actively progressed by forces.
  • Survivors must be kept informed and treated with care throughout investigations.
  • Dedicated teams should be established to progress long-running sexual offences investigations.
  • Suspects released under investigation must be properly risk-managed and monitored.
  • Police and prosecutors must be held accountable for excessive delays
  • Accurate data must be published regarding how long sexual offence investigations really take, so that we can monitor the situation and forces can be held accountable.

Read our full list of 23 recommendations now (page 11)

Have you been affected by this issue?

Please know that you're not alone.

If you're currently living in England and Wales – including in asylum accommodation – there are lots of organisations and services that might be able to offer you support.

Here are some links you might find helpful:

A young woman sits in a chair while talking to an older woman who is a counsellor. The older woman is sat on a sofa next to the chair and is using a laptop on a table.